New recipes

VIEW 62 by Paco Roncero to Open in Hong Kong

VIEW 62 by Paco Roncero to Open in Hong Kong

We are searching data for your request:

Forums and discussions:
Manuals and reference books:
Data from registers:
Wait the end of the search in all databases.
Upon completion, a link will appear to access the found materials.

The revolving restaurant sets a new table for avant-garde gastronomists in Asia

Chef Paco Roncero, at his new Hong Kong restaurant VIEW 62 by Paco Roncero, has been awarded two Michelin stars for his avant-garde gastronomy.

Paco Roncero, one of Spain’s top chefs, brings nouvelle cuisine to Hong Kong in the form of VIEW 62 by Paco Roncero. VIEW 62 by Paco Roncero is the former British colony’s only revolving restaurant, and will open in mid-June. The two-Michelin star chef has made a name for himself with his avant-garde cuisine at Madrid’s Casino de Madrid and at gastro bar Estado Puro.

The new restaurant on the Hopewell Centre’s 62nd floor on Queen’s Road East in Wan Chai features modern European fare created from Roncero’s latest forays into culinary science and nouvelle cuisine techniques.

The interior design injects as much experimentation and innovation as the food — the restaurant features three areas, including a lounge with an eight-meter-long black marble bar embossed with mother of pearl, a DJ booth, and an undulating ceiling with more than 50,000 hanging wooden sticks that create the illusion of being in the clouds. The floor mirrors the motif with hand knotted wool carpet that resembles ripples made by raindrops.

A private dining area with a chef’s table and the main dining area are designed in a palette of retro black polished chrome, dusky purples, and faux lizard skin. The restaurant rotates one full cycle every hour, providing diners with views of Hong Kong’s iconic sites like Victoria Harbor and The Peak.

Watch the video: Paco Roncero, el maestro del aceite y los lácteos


  1. Migul

    In my opinion, this is an interesting question, I will take part in the discussion. Together we can come to the right answer. I'm sure.

  2. Deman

    Thanks immense for the help in this matter, now I will not admit such error.

  3. Piperel

    In my opinion you are mistaken. I suggest it to discuss. Write to me in PM, we will communicate.

  4. Peverell

    In my opinion, they are wrong. I am able to prove it.

  5. Efran

    I join. I agree with told all above. Let's discuss this question.

Write a message